|
|
On "Ethics for Now and the Future"
|
Stimulus
An extract from the an essay by Kirdendal, referenced below, elicited
a spontaneous comparison with moral philosophies of the Okal
Rel universe. - ljw
The extract gave four pillars for a moral system, reproduced in
their essentials below.
- Should serve to insure the survival of mankind.
Survial, however, should be interpreted as more than mere existence.
It should be survival with joy and satisfaction; both physical
and mental...
- Must rest upon a logical, rational, openly-acknowledged
framework. Ethical decision making must have an authoritative
basis. Otherwise it is likely to be capricious and inconsistent,
often contradictory. This means more, however, than simply balancing
one research fact against another. It requires a respect for the
intuitive wisdom acquired through the ages...
- Should be applicable universally. Increasingly
we are living in a world where cross-cultural contacts are more
readily experienced and communication between people and groups
is becoming easier ...
- Should rest upon the basic need for enhancing altruistic
experience, both in giving and receiving. The desire for
edifying associations, both immediately and in the long run, is
highly important and a deeply ingrained human need...we should
not neglect the greater moral universe.
|
|
Response
Okal
Rel meets the four criteria as follows:
- Should serve to insure the survival of mankind.
This is Okal Rel's key tenant. That conflict between groups
and individuals within groups must not escalate to the level of
destroying the ability of planets or artificial environments to
support life. Such habitats are intrinsically fragile and survival
impossible if groups or individuals are able to exert maximum
force or indiscriminate use of biological science in pursuit of
their self-interest. Restriction of conflicts to personal combat
is the Okal Rel solution, allowing the fortunes of individuals
to rise and fall according to their prowess and connections without
threatening society as a whole.
- Must rest upon a logical, rational, openly-acknowledged
framework. Belief in reincarnation of the soul in descendants
of one's own line underpins Okal Rel, explaining why extermination
of a blood line is so much more serious than killing individuals
and the horror of becoming "lost" during space warfare.
Space warfare is, of course, an evil that Okal Rel strives
to minimize. The role of the Watching Dead, also known as the
Waiting Dead, who influence the living world and have a stake
in civilization surviving for them to be reborn into it, is the
spiritual threat meant to keep believers in line. Apparently irrational
events are explained in terms of the moral struggles between the
Watching Dead, who are likewise partisan, and the Gods of Earth,
widely believed to be mad. Great Souls are those with special
force of will and wisdom, re-born into lines to correct life-threatening
imbalances and show their followers the way to survial for the
good of all, both dead and living.
- Should be applicable universally. Variations exist
between bloodlines and tribes of Sevolites about details as esoteric
as whether new souls are a common or rare occurence, or as sweeping
as who does and does not count as a moral being. On the whole,
however, at least among the powerful (Sevolites), there is general
agreement that sustaining a world for souls to be reborn into
is the ultimate good, and that even enemies must unite to crush
and exterminate the okal'a'ni -- those who put their own
ambitions or desires above risk to the carrying capacity for life
in the universe.
- Should rest upon the basic need for enhancing altruistic
experience, both in giving and receiving. Okal Rel
legitimizes murder in the context of duels. But it promotes altruistic
behavior towards the children of enemies, and the avoidance of
inflicting harm on by-standers or an enemy's dependents. Killing
a leader is a triumph (provided it is done by the rules governing
Sword Law). Exterminating a bloodlines is a grave sin. Killing
anyone could mess with the plans of some member of the Watching
Dead, and should not be undertaken lightly.
Okal Lumens, and the Orthodox Nesak interpretation
of Okal Rel, are variations cultivated by specific groups.
Okal Lumens focuses on the pol, or "gentle" virutes.
Orthodox Okal Rel excludes "inferior" classes
of humans and promotes the goal of a universe populated by a single
population of "souls", but not so much by "soul death"
but by absorbing worthy enemies into the One True Line. Elements
of both extremes are echoes in related, but less purist cultures.
For example, Nersallian views are closer to those of their Nesak
cousins than, for example, the Red Vrellish. And the Silver Demish
value most of the works and beliefs of Okal Lumens, at least
as an ideal too rarified for any but true Goldens to adhere to.
The
Arbiter Administration of Rire meets the four criteria as follows:
- Should serve to insure the survival of mankind.
Rire, too, must contend with the imbalance between the potential
for destruction inherent in both reality-skimming in particular
and the malicious use of science, in general. Surrendering the
administration (although not the creation) of governance to arbiters,
and living in a transparent society in which any kind of information
hiding not of a strictly personal nature, is the solution they
have struck on.
- Must rest upon a logical, rational, openly-acknowledged
framework. Reetions are humanists who adhere to an egalitarian
ethic making privacy a privilege, not a right. Misuse of everyone's
ability to access nearly everything about nearly everybody is
tracked via complaints and intervention by counselors or "first
responders". The existance of arbiters makes this hugely
complex system practical. Arbiters are symbiotic AIs with high
intelligence but little or no self-awareness which administer
all Reetion law. The laws are created and adjusted by human councils.
About 10 per cent of Reetions, at any given time, are "Voting
Citizens" who serve on these councils, devoting a large portion
of their time to keeping the system in balance. Jurisdictional
conflicts constantly introduced by lobbies for change from the
populus or adjustments made by councils which impact other legislative
bodies, are a common challenge.
- Should be applicable universally. All citizens
of Rire must be willing to be governed by the arbiter administration.
Pilots must concent to pre and post flight psychological profiling
in order to be allowed to fly. Transparency is not an option.
- Should rest upon the basic need for enhancing altruistic
experience, both in giving and receiving. The certainty
of even minor misdemeanors being logged and shifted by arbiters
able to act to correct the behavior or refer up to council of
humans, tends to mold behavior as desired. The certainty of reward
for acting in an altruistic manner, however small grained the
"coin", is likewise motivating. For example, a person
who does his or her share in keeping the neighborhood tidy is
automatically observed doing so and credited accordingly. Defining
what is credited and against which social "account"
is, naturally, a challenge for those setting the behavior of the
arbiters who administer the details.
|
reference:
Kirdendal, Lester A. "An Ethical System for Now and
the Future". 1980. Humanist Ethics: Dialogue on Basics. Ed.
Morris B. Storer. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1980. p. 193-209
|